E-mail List Archives
Re: [EXTERNAL] Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?
From: Catherine Roy
Date: Mar 4, 2021 4:51AM
- Next message: Lars Ballieu Christensen: "Re: PDF remediation as-needed services"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: [EXTERNAL] Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Magennis: "Re: [EXTERNAL] Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: [EXTERNAL] Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- View all messages in this Thread
+1
--
Catherine Roy
www.catherine-roy.net
> On Mar 4, 2021, at 6:25 AM, Steve Green < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Although it's not strictly relevant to this discussion, I strongly recommend the exact opposite. In most contexts, I advocate conducting a full manual test first, and only then use an automated tool as a safety net.
>
> The rationale, which I have observed in practice, is that the automated tool results adversely affect how people do the manual testing. They miss issues the tool didn't report, perhaps because there is a subliminal voice telling them there's nothing wrong there. They tend to report issues exactly as the tool reported them, even if the tool misdiagnosed them, which is not uncommon. This shouldn't happen, but it does.
>
> Steve Green
> Managing Director
> Test Partners Ltd
>
>
>
- Next message: Lars Ballieu Christensen: "Re: PDF remediation as-needed services"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: [EXTERNAL] Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Magennis: "Re: [EXTERNAL] Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: [EXTERNAL] Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- View all messages in this Thread