E-mail List Archives
Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate
From: David Engebretson Jr.
Date: Oct 31, 2023 7:02AM
- Next message: L Snider: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- Next message in Thread: L Snider: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- View all messages in this Thread
Something else to think about, concerning time estimations, is how the client expects you to present the data you find during your review. Is the client fine with receiving a big numbered list of issues from each page, or do they want a full report with extended details and suggested code techniques to fix the issues?
Oh, and also, do they want quality assurance feedback such as spelling and grammar? Sometimes a site can be very accessible and usable but the usability and trustworthiness of the site and its content can dip when care isn't taken when writing the content. QA analysis can be a real time sink as you are doing reviews, if you are sensitive to that sort of thing.
So much to think about!
Best,
David
-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 4:35 AM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Accesslibity review_time estimate
It will obviously depend on how many individual samples you've split the assessment into, and how complex those samples are. If all they are is static, reasonably straightforward content pages, then you would generally be able to go through and test a few (3, 4, possibly more if they're really short) in a day. On the other end of the spectrum, you may have samples that are exceedingly complex ... like a whole interactive Excel-like grid which also generates interactive explorable graphs etc...at which point it may take you a few days just to verify an individual sample (or split it into smaller, more manageable chunks).
So whichever formula you arrive at, it will likely involve number of samples and complexity of individual samples.
Patrick
On 31/10/2023 11:12, Claire Forbes wrote:
> Good morning,
> I'm consistently being asked for an estimate on how long an accesslibity review will take.
> I know everyone here is well aware of the many factors that go into an accessibility review that could determine the length of time you work on it BUT does anyone have a good "formula" for providing time estimates to customers?
>
> Thank you!
> Claire
>
> Claire Forbes
>
> Victor 12, Inc.
> 2420 Lakemont Ave. Suite 175
> Orlando, FL 32814
>
> Tel:
> Fax: 407-985-1980
> Web: www.victor12.com
>
> CVE SDVOSB | VOSB | GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) GSâ02Fâ087BA
> âThis message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> âIf you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.
> âAny other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> --
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: L Snider: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- Next message in Thread: L Snider: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate"
- View all messages in this Thread