WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: Accesslibity review_time estimate

for

Number of posts in this thread: 4 (In chronological order)

From: Ryan E. Benson
Date: Tue, Oct 31 2023 5:24AM
Subject: Accesslibity review_time estimate
No previous message | Next message →

I would recommend considering what you mean by review. I do a general
yes/no, which I can do in 5 minutes. I can touch a bulk of the site,
provide detailed feedback, and resources in about a week.

--
Ryan E. Benson

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, 7:13 AM Claire Forbes < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:

> Good morning,
> I'm consistently being asked for an estimate on how long an accesslibity
> review will take.
> I know everyone here is well aware of the many factors that go into an
> accessibility review that could determine the length of time you work on it
> BUT does anyone have a good "formula" for providing time estimates to
> customers?
>
> Thank you!
> Claire
>
> Claire Forbes
>
> Victor 12, Inc.
> 2420 Lakemont Ave. Suite 175
> Orlando, FL 32814
>
> Tel:
> Fax: 407-985-1980
> Web: www.victor12.com
>
> CVE SDVOSB | VOSB | GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) GS‑02F‑087BA
> ​This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> ​If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original.
> ​Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> > > > >

From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Tue, Oct 31 2023 5:34AM
Subject: Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate
← Previous message | Next message →

It will obviously depend on how many individual samples you've split the
assessment into, and how complex those samples are. If all they are is
static, reasonably straightforward content pages, then you would
generally be able to go through and test a few (3, 4, possibly more if
they're really short) in a day. On the other end of the spectrum, you
may have samples that are exceedingly complex ... like a whole
interactive Excel-like grid which also generates interactive explorable
graphs etc...at which point it may take you a few days just to verify an
individual sample (or split it into smaller, more manageable chunks).

So whichever formula you arrive at, it will likely involve number of
samples and complexity of individual samples.

Patrick

On 31/10/2023 11:12, Claire Forbes wrote:
> Good morning,
> I'm consistently being asked for an estimate on how long an accesslibity review will take.
> I know everyone here is well aware of the many factors that go into an accessibility review that could determine the length of time you work on it BUT does anyone have a good "formula" for providing time estimates to customers?
>
> Thank you!
> Claire
>
> Claire Forbes
>
> Victor 12, Inc.
> 2420 Lakemont Ave. Suite 175
> Orlando, FL 32814
>
> Tel:
> Fax: 407-985-1980
> Web: www.victor12.com
>
> CVE SDVOSB | VOSB | GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) GS‑02F‑087BA
> ​This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> ​If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.
> ​Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> > > > --
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

From: David Engebretson Jr.
Date: Tue, Oct 31 2023 7:02AM
Subject: Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate
← Previous message | Next message →

Something else to think about, concerning time estimations, is how the client expects you to present the data you find during your review. Is the client fine with receiving a big numbered list of issues from each page, or do they want a full report with extended details and suggested code techniques to fix the issues?

Oh, and also, do they want quality assurance feedback such as spelling and grammar? Sometimes a site can be very accessible and usable but the usability and trustworthiness of the site and its content can dip when care isn't taken when writing the content. QA analysis can be a real time sink as you are doing reviews, if you are sensitive to that sort of thing.

So much to think about!

Best,
David


-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 4:35 AM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Accesslibity review_time estimate

It will obviously depend on how many individual samples you've split the assessment into, and how complex those samples are. If all they are is static, reasonably straightforward content pages, then you would generally be able to go through and test a few (3, 4, possibly more if they're really short) in a day. On the other end of the spectrum, you may have samples that are exceedingly complex ... like a whole interactive Excel-like grid which also generates interactive explorable graphs etc...at which point it may take you a few days just to verify an individual sample (or split it into smaller, more manageable chunks).

So whichever formula you arrive at, it will likely involve number of samples and complexity of individual samples.

Patrick

On 31/10/2023 11:12, Claire Forbes wrote:
> Good morning,
> I'm consistently being asked for an estimate on how long an accesslibity review will take.
> I know everyone here is well aware of the many factors that go into an accessibility review that could determine the length of time you work on it BUT does anyone have a good "formula" for providing time estimates to customers?
>
> Thank you!
> Claire
>
> Claire Forbes
>
> Victor 12, Inc.
> 2420 Lakemont Ave. Suite 175
> Orlando, FL 32814
>
> Tel:
> Fax: 407-985-1980
> Web: www.victor12.com
>
> CVE SDVOSB | VOSB | GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) GS‑02F‑087BA
> ​This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> ​If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.
> ​Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> --
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

From: L Snider
Date: Tue, Oct 31 2023 7:22AM
Subject: Re: Accesslibity review_time estimate
← Previous message | No next message

Tough question to answer as people like me do reports differently (not a
checklist yes or no-for me that isn't what this is about). Plus, do you
employ auditors with different disabilities, who are experts with their
tech? Or auditors who don't use tech, but are experts in their
disabilities? That can add a lot of time.

Cheers

Lisa



On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:13 AM Claire Forbes < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:

> Good morning,
> I'm consistently being asked for an estimate on how long an accesslibity
> review will take.
> I know everyone here is well aware of the many factors that go into an
> accessibility review that could determine the length of time you work on it
> BUT does anyone have a good "formula" for providing time estimates to
> customers?
>
> Thank you!
> Claire
>
> Claire Forbes
>
> Victor 12, Inc.
> 2420 Lakemont Ave. Suite 175
> Orlando, FL 32814
>
> Tel:
> Fax: 407-985-1980
> Web: www.victor12.com
>
> CVE SDVOSB | VOSB | GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) GS‑02F‑087BA
> ​This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> ​If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original.
> ​Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
> > > > >