E-mail List Archives
Re: Web accessibility and usability
From: Annmarie L Gemma
Date: Oct 11, 2004 9:52AM
- Next message: Annmarie L Gemma: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- Next message in Thread: Annmarie L Gemma: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- Previous message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- View all messages in this Thread
Mike, Jon, Chris, Andrea, Glenda, and Patrick,
I want to thank you all for your ideas. I am reviewing your postings and the suggested articles, and will likely have questions if you don't mind, once I have a better handle on the topic.
Thanks for your feedback....
Annmarie
----- Original Message -----
From: "michael.brockington"
Date: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:13 am
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Web accessibility and usability
>
>
> > From: jongund [ <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
> >
> > I do not think you can make a general statement that
> > accessibility means poorer usability.
> >
>
> Hold on a minute - that is nothing like what I said! Almost the
> reverse, in
> fact. What I said was that 'occasionaly' there was a conflict.
> In other words, I don't think that you can say that accessibility
> means_better_ usability.
> Sometimes we have to drop the bells and whistles off a site to remain
> accessible. Given enough time, most things can be worked around,
> but none of
> us ever have enough time, so some things remain un-implemented. An
> obviousparallel is the WCAG advice regarding ALT/TITLE atributes -
> having them alone
> is not enough - they must be meaningful. I have seen many sites
> recentlysporting various accessibility logos, where it is
> impossible to find your way
> around: if the Author had spent less time running pages through
> Bobby et al
> the site might have had useful navigation.
> On a technical note, the levels of interactivity that DHTML
> brought us is
> anathema to accessibility. For example my understanding is that
> date-pickers
> are a no-no for accessibility, so we have to take a step backward in
> useability, since they might confuse some users.
>
> Mike
>
>
> ********************************************************************
>
> This email may contain information which is privileged or
> confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email,
> please notify the sender immediately and delete it without
> reading, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing its contents
> to any other person
> Thank you
>
> Check us out at http://www.bt.com/consulting
>
> ********************************************************************
>
> ----
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>
>
- Next message: Annmarie L Gemma: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- Next message in Thread: Annmarie L Gemma: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- Previous message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: Web accessibility and usability"
- View all messages in this Thread