E-mail List Archives
Re: XHTML Content Negotiation revisited
From: Tim Beadle
Date: Aug 18, 2005 6:20AM
- Next message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Skip navigation coding"
- Previous message: L: "RE: checking flash for accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: James Pickering: "Re: XHTML Content Negotiation revisited"
- Previous message in Thread: James Pickering: "XHTML Content Negotiation revisited"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 8/17/05, James Pickering < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I solicit comments on the validity of my exercise -- and comments in
> general.
All good stuff, but as I mentioned before: are you going to fork your
DOM Scripts for the two styles of rendering (text/html vs
application/xhtml+xml) ?
I'd wager that this is a big show stopper. Client-side scripting isn't
evil if done properly, and more and more people are using it to add
value to their web sites and applications.
If you can *guarantee* that you won't be using DOM Scripting in your
site, then sure: go ahead, use content negotiation.
Tim
- Next message: Jim Thatcher: "RE: Skip navigation coding"
- Previous message: L: "RE: checking flash for accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: James Pickering: "Re: XHTML Content Negotiation revisited"
- Previous message in Thread: James Pickering: "XHTML Content Negotiation revisited"
- View all messages in this Thread