E-mail List Archives
Re: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Jan 10, 2006 6:20PM
- Next message: Tim Beadle: "Re: All in the Head: Document Type Definition"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: back to top"
- Next message in Thread: Malcolm Wotton: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- View all messages in this Thread
Malcolm Wotton wrote:
> But they're not :(
So pressure needs to be applied to browser manufacturers. We're getting
WCAG 2.0 and ATAG 2.0 ... where's UAAG 2.0? Why do web developers have
to shoulder the burden once again?
> remember that nearly all web
> standards were once innovations by software developers or site designers.
> While I am in favour of standards, I am also in favour of innovation, and it
> seems to me that this innovation (if implemented well) does not degrade the
> experience for anyone, if anything it draws attention to the fact that fonts
> can be resized.
Innovation? You call a workaround to compensate for bad browser UI (and,
at the time when text resize widgets first came out, a means to use
pixel based text sizes and let IE users resize them anyway) an innovation?
--
Patrick H. Lauke
___________
re
- Next message: Tim Beadle: "Re: All in the Head: Document Type Definition"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: back to top"
- Next message in Thread: Malcolm Wotton: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- View all messages in this Thread