WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: PDF access (was Screen-reader updates)

for

From: Ouida Myers
Date: Mar 1, 2006 9:10AM

Please tell me more about PDF files. I thought tagging them made them
accessible.

Tagging is something that is available in Pro but not Standard. I used
this feature to establish document structure and reading order.

Ouida

Ouida W. Myers
Grant Consultant and Administrator
Instructional Technologies
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
6364 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27601-6364
(919) 807-3271
FAX (919) 807-3290

http://www.ncwiseowl.org/Impact/div_it/
********************************************
All e-mail correspondence to and from this
address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law, which may result in
monitoring and disclosure to third parties,
including law enforcement.

In compliance with federal laws, N C Public
Schools administers all state-operated
educational programs, employment activities
and admissions without discrimination because
of race, religion, national or ethnic origin,
color, age, military service, disability, or
gender, except where exemption is appropriate
and allowed by law.

Inquiries or complaints should be directed to:
Dr. Elsie C. Leak, Associate Superintendent
Office of Curriculum and School Reform Services
6307 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6307
Telephone (919) 807-3761
Fax (919) 807-3767

>>> <EMAIL REMOVED> 3/1/2006 1:16 AM >>>

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Joe Clark wrote:

>> PDF is the worst offender in this category.
>
> Hardly.
>
> Tried to read a Visio file lately?

I never encountered a Visio file on the Web, or on a CD-rom.

PDF is one of the top five accessibility problems (obstacles), since it
is
so widespread and causes serious problems to so many different groups
of
people. Even people who have no particular disability frequently
encounter
problems with PDF, starting from the fact that opening a PDF file takes

much longer than opening an HTML document with comparable content.
It all too often freezes the browser, and this is not just an
inconvenience if the user does not see or does not understand what is
happening. It also prevents changing font face and size. (Zooming
should
not be confused with font size changing.)

Several recommendations have warned against using PDF as the only
format for delivering information on the Web, but its use has grown a
lot,
and the recommendations are being watered down.

The reason is simple: when first priority is to have documents
_printed_
(and when people are used to using tools that generate PDF), just
putting
PDF files on the Web is a simple way of dealing with the dual
publishing
problem. The publisher does not care about the implications and does
not
even see them. Besides, he can present excuses like references to Adobe

statements that say that PDF is OK.

This is more or less the answer you'll get from the officials if you
get
any answer when asking questions like "your recommendations say that
PDF-only material is no-no, so why do you have so much PDF-only
material
on your site?"

--
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/