E-mail List Archives
Re: Semantically pointless?
From: Pete Fairhurst
Date: Mar 13, 2006 10:40AM
- Next message: Karl Groves: "RE: Semantically pointless?"
- Previous message: Michael D. Roush: "Re: Webmail suggestions"
- Next message in Thread: Karl Groves: "RE: Semantically pointless?"
- Previous message in Thread: Karl Groves: "RE: Semantically pointless?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 13/03/06, Karl Groves < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> <b> serves no purpose, other than visual. If your goal is to indicate
> "semantic" importance, you should use <strong>, which is read with a
> stronger emphasis by screen readers.
>
In that case, would I be correct in assuming that simply replacing the <b>
elements surrounding either image would produce the desired result within a
screen reader?
- Pete F.
_________
"A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured
and then quietly strangled." -Sir Barnett Cocks
_________
- Next message: Karl Groves: "RE: Semantically pointless?"
- Previous message: Michael D. Roush: "Re: Webmail suggestions"
- Next message in Thread: Karl Groves: "RE: Semantically pointless?"
- Previous message in Thread: Karl Groves: "RE: Semantically pointless?"
- View all messages in this Thread