E-mail List Archives
RE: NOSCRIPT question
From: Steven Faulkner
Date: May 2, 2006 7:30PM
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- Previous message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- Previous message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- View all messages in this Thread
Chris wrote
> And how is that more logical than having the definitions at the end of
> the page and using target links on the words?
I didn't claim that it was more or less logical than any other method,
and I agree that implementing a different method may be more logical.
The example I gave was to demonstrate a possible use of the NOSCRIPT
element.
After testing the functionality of their script with assistive
technology and keyboard I found that it was accessible via a number of
user agents and input devices with javascript enabled.
It is not my role to tell them that their "script planning" is "sad"
unless it impacts upon the accessibility of the content.
with regards
Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
vision australia - information & library service
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: <EMAIL REMOVED>
www.accessibleinfo.org.au | www.wat-c.org
Download the Web Accessibility Toolbar
[http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/ais/toolbar/]
Vision Australia was formed through the merger of the Royal Blind
Society
NSW, the Royal Victorian Institute for the Blind, Vision Australia
Foundation and the National Information & Library Service.
ABN: 67 108 391 831 ACN: 108 391 831
>
- Next message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- Previous message: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- Next message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- Previous message in Thread: Andrew Kirkpatrick: "RE: NOSCRIPT question"
- View all messages in this Thread