E-mail List Archives
Re: Longdesc in Images
From: Jukka K. Korpela
Date: Sep 25, 2006 2:50AM
- Next message: Patrick Lauke: "RE: Longdesc in Images"
- Previous message: Tim Beadle: "Re: Longdesc in Images"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick Lauke: "RE: Longdesc in Images"
- Previous message in Thread: Tim Beadle: "Re: Longdesc in Images"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Tim Beadle wrote:
> Does a logo *need* a long description?
It doesn't, and it is surely misleading and potentially quite confusing to
make a logo, used otherwise normally as a logo, a link to a description of
the logo.
If you have something to say about the design of a logo, then you can say
that on separate page, or in a separate section of some page. Any link
pointing to it should we written along normal link text design principle:
descriptive, concise, and distinctive. "About our logo" or "Description of
the ACME logo" might work.
--
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
- Next message: Patrick Lauke: "RE: Longdesc in Images"
- Previous message: Tim Beadle: "Re: Longdesc in Images"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick Lauke: "RE: Longdesc in Images"
- Previous message in Thread: Tim Beadle: "Re: Longdesc in Images"
- View all messages in this Thread