E-mail List Archives
Re: Serif vs sans-serif
From: Harkins, Denise
Date: Jan 3, 2007 1:00PM
- Next message: Owens, Parker: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message: Moore, Michael: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Next message in Thread: Owens, Parker: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore, Michael: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- View all messages in this Thread
You have a very good question. Everything that I have read on this
issue: is to USE SERIF FONTS FOR PRINT, and USE SANS SERIF FOR SCREEN
READING. However, this is probably in reference to non-visual impaired
readers.
I came from designing for the printing industry and then became more
involved with on-screen designs, and that is one of the things they also
say to do. But remember one can also think OUTSIDE THE BOX if you want
to be creative.
I usually go with this rule of thumb. If it a lot of copy to read, use
serif, if it is shorter or broken into smaller chunks of text, then you
can use sans serif.
Denise A. Harkins
Publications & Web Site Coordinator
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
Customer Services Division
PHONE: 405-702-1010
FAX: 405-702-1001
<EMAIL REMOVED>
- Next message: Owens, Parker: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message: Moore, Michael: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Next message in Thread: Owens, Parker: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore, Michael: "Re: Serif vs sans-serif"
- View all messages in this Thread