E-mail List Archives

Search E-mail List Archives for

Number of posts in this thread: 9 (In chronological order)

From: Joan Preston
Date: Thu, Mar 30 2017 2:34PM
Subject: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
No previous message | Next message →

Hi all,

Has anyone tried implementing Googles Invisible reCAPTCHA? If yes, tested it with assistive technology? I know it states it is invisible, but not sure if it's truly invisible to AT users.

https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/docs/invisible

Thanks,

Joan Preston
Web Accessibility Coordinator
ITS - California State University, Long Beach
562.985.1490

From: Jim Allan
Date: Thu, Mar 30 2017 2:45PM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | Next message →

for me, worked in Chrome with Jaws. Failed everytime with FF and Jaws

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Joan Preston < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone tried implementing Googles Invisible reCAPTCHA? If yes, tested
> it with assistive technology? I know it states it is invisible, but not
> sure if it's truly invisible to AT users.
>
> https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/docs/invisible
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joan Preston
> Web Accessibility Coordinator
> ITS - California State University, Long Beach
> 562.985.1490
>
>
> > > > >



--
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964

From: Joan Preston
Date: Mon, Apr 03 2017 9:07AM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | Next message →

Thanks Jim for your reply and letting me know what it worked in.

From: Joan Preston
Date: Mon, Apr 03 2017 10:25AM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | Next message →

Hi Jim,

Have you tested Invisible reCAPTCHA with IE11 and JAWS?

Thanks,

Joan Preston
Web Accessibility Coordinator
ITS - California State University, Long Beach
562.985.1490

From: Jim Allan
Date: Mon, Apr 03 2017 3:42PM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | Next message →

I tried this page
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/demo?invisible=true
with IE 11 and Jaws on Windows 7 - tried 5 times Failed every time

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Joan Preston < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> Have you tested Invisible reCAPTCHA with IE11 and JAWS?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joan Preston
> Web Accessibility Coordinator
> ITS - California State University, Long Beach
> 562.985.1490
>
>
>
>

From: Joan Preston
Date: Mon, Apr 03 2017 5:25PM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | Next message →

Thanks for pointing me to the demo. I tried on Windows 10 and you need to take it out of Virtual Mode to add the numbers or use the number pad. It worked the same for both reCAPTCHA and invisible ReCAPTCHA. I don't understand why Google does not make this accessible, it wouldn't take too many changes to get it there.

Thanks,

Joan Preston
Web Accessibility Coordinator
ITS - California State University, Long Beach
562.985.1490


From: Jim Allan [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 2:43 PM
To: Joan Preston < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Cc: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA

I tried this page
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/demo?invisible=true
with IE 11 and Jaws on Windows 7 - tried 5 times Failed every time

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Joan Preston < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = <mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >> wrote:
Hi Jim,

Have you tested Invisible reCAPTCHA with IE11 and JAWS?

Thanks,

Joan Preston
Web Accessibility Coordinator
ITS - California State University, Long Beach
562.985.1490<tel:562.985.1490>

From: Bossley, Peter A.
Date: Mon, Apr 03 2017 7:28PM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | Next message →

I have to say, from an accessibility standpoint, I much prefer text captchas that ask questions in text format in order to verify a human. Yes, this requires a sufficiently large sample of questions to prevent automated question answering, and no, it isn't perfect, but it is the only solution I've seen that works for those with both blindness and deafness.

From: Jeremy Echols
Date: Tue, Apr 04 2017 9:33AM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | Next message →

I concur. I avoid the mouse whenever possible (wrist pain), and substandard-but-not-atrocious vision, and I find most captchas very annoying. I have yet to figure out how to do the "pick the images that show a street sign" type with just the keyboard. Many captchas are hard for me to read and my vision isn't even all that bad. I've tried the audio captchas and found them even tougher.

If a site has a difficult captcha and the content isn't something I consider a "must have", I tend to just give up and look for something similar elsewhere.

A long time ago I implemented a very naive captcha that consisted of questions like "Type in the third letter of the word 'chicken'". It was effective at stopping most of our spam problems because it was a one-off captcha that bots didn't bother to handle. ...but I don't know how well that sort of problem works for people with cognitive issues.
From: WebAIM-Forum < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > on behalf of Bossley, Peter A. < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 6:28 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List; Jim Allan
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA

I have to say, from an accessibility standpoint, I much prefer text captchas that ask questions in text format in order to verify a human. Yes, this requires a sufficiently large sample of questions to prevent automated question answering, and no, it isn't perfect, but it is the only solution I've seen that works for those with both blindness and deafness.

From: Joan Preston
Date: Tue, Apr 04 2017 12:15PM
Subject: Re: Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA
← Previous message | No next message

I appreciate all the feedback. I have seen forms that ask the user to add or subtract numbers or some other logical question. Not sure how well they work against the spambots or if there are issues for cognitive impaired users.