WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: Re: Universities Legal Web Accessibility Update

for

Number of posts in this thread: 3 (In chronological order)

From: Jason Taylor-UsableNet
Date: Mon, Dec 08 2003 10:59AM
Subject: Re: Universities Legal Web Accessibility Update
No previous message | Next message →

In order to follow up some postings with regard the legal position of
Universities with regard to Section 508 and Web Accessibility. I approached
Ken. S. Nakata of The US DOJ. In short, it seems that the provision of
Section 508 effecting Universities due to Tech Act funding was wrong and we
apologize for this. My short e-mail discussion with Ken is below.


-----------------

1. "If I am creating and maintaining web content for students and faculty of
a public university which Disabilities act would most likely apply to my web
content?"

504 (if federally-funded) and title II of the ADA.

2. "Does Section 508 of the Rehabilitations act apply to me in the above
scenario - if so when and why, and if not when and why?"

No. (when ask for clarity on this, the response was "508 doesn't apply. The
stuff from Cynthia is incorrect, because that was a former (and
unsupportable) position articulated by the Department of Education. We had
to get them to change that".)

3. What types of access to web content should a university consider to
satisfy their legal requirements under any laws you outline above?

First, it's probably essential to provide access to alternative sources of
information... e.g. a person answering email or the phone regarding web page
content. Doesn't necessarily have to be 24/7, but the delay in response
shouldn't be unreasonable (of course, that depends on what it is that's
required). As far as design standards, either 508 or WAI would go a long
way to meeting 504/ada obligations in most circumstances (but not all as
these standards do not aid all forms of disabilities).

------------------

Ken is referring to the below 508 statement on Cynthia's site being out
dated.

[12] Section 508 was originally added to the Rehabilitation Act in 1986.

From: Kelly Hokkanen
Date: Tue, Dec 09 2003 9:10AM
Subject: RE: Universities Legal Web Accessibility Update
← Previous message | Next message →

Thanks for this information. Does any one have similar updates on the
applicability of federal law to state government websites?

Thanks,
Kelly
-----------------------------
Kelly Hokkanen
Director of Creative Services
InforME: Information Resource of Maine
(207)621-2600 x28
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
www.maine.gov

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Taylor-UsableNet [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:50 PM
To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Subject: Re: Universities Legal Web Accessibility Update


In order to follow up some postings with regard the legal position of
Universities with regard to Section 508 and Web Accessibility. I
approached Ken. S. Nakata of The US DOJ. In short, it seems that the
provision of Section 508 effecting Universities due to Tech Act funding
was wrong and we apologize for this. My short e-mail discussion with Ken
is below.


-----------------

1. "If I am creating and maintaining web content for students and
faculty of a public university which Disabilities act would most likely
apply to my web content?"

504 (if federally-funded) and title II of the ADA.

2. "Does Section 508 of the Rehabilitations act apply to me in the above
scenario - if so when and why, and if not when and why?"

No. (when ask for clarity on this, the response was "508 doesn't apply.
The stuff from Cynthia is incorrect, because that was a former (and
unsupportable) position articulated by the Department of Education. We
had to get them to change that".)

3. What types of access to web content should a university consider to
satisfy their legal requirements under any laws you outline above?

First, it's probably essential to provide access to alternative sources
of information... e.g. a person answering email or the phone regarding
web page content. Doesn't necessarily have to be 24/7, but the delay in
response shouldn't be unreasonable (of course, that depends on what it
is that's required). As far as design standards, either 508 or WAI
would go a long way to meeting 504/ada obligations in most circumstances
(but not all as these standards do not aid all forms of disabilities).

------------------

Ken is referring to the below 508 statement on Cynthia's site being out
dated.

[12] Section 508 was originally added to the Rehabilitation Act in
1986.

From: Jason Taylor-UsableNet
Date: Wed, Dec 10 2003 1:32PM
Subject: Re: Universities Legal Web Accessibility Update
← Previous message | No next message

Hello Kelly

I am not sure if this is bang-on what you are looking for but yesterdays
cast.org news letter had a link to:

A Concise Summary of State Laws Pertaining to the Provision of Accessible
Materials for K-12 Students with Print Disabilities
http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=4640

Regards
Jason, UsableNet


> Thanks for this information. Does any one have similar updates on the
> applicability of federal law to state government websites?
>
> Thanks,
> Kelly
> -----------------------------
> Kelly Hokkanen
> Director of Creative Services
> InforME: Information Resource of Maine
> (207)621-2600 x28
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> www.maine.gov
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Taylor-UsableNet [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> Subject: Re: Universities Legal Web Accessibility Update
>
>
> In order to follow up some postings with regard the legal position of
> Universities with regard to Section 508 and Web Accessibility. I
> approached Ken. S. Nakata of The US DOJ. In short, it seems that the
> provision of Section 508 effecting Universities due to Tech Act funding
> was wrong and we apologize for this. My short e-mail discussion with Ken
> is below.
>
>
> -----------------
>
> 1. "If I am creating and maintaining web content for students and
> faculty of a public university which Disabilities act would most likely
> apply to my web content?"
>
> 504 (if federally-funded) and title II of the ADA.
>
> 2. "Does Section 508 of the Rehabilitations act apply to me in the above
> scenario - if so when and why, and if not when and why?"
>
> No. (when ask for clarity on this, the response was "508 doesn't apply.
> The stuff from Cynthia is incorrect, because that was a former (and
> unsupportable) position articulated by the Department of Education. We
> had to get them to change that".)
>
> 3. What types of access to web content should a university consider to
> satisfy their legal requirements under any laws you outline above?
>
> First, it's probably essential to provide access to alternative sources
> of information... e.g. a person answering email or the phone regarding
> web page content. Doesn't necessarily have to be 24/7, but the delay in
> response shouldn't be unreasonable (of course, that depends on what it
> is that's required). As far as design standards, either 508 or WAI
> would go a long way to meeting 504/ada obligations in most circumstances
> (but not all as these standards do not aid all forms of disabilities).
>
> ------------------
>
> Ken is referring to the below 508 statement on Cynthia's site being out
> dated.
>
> [12] Section 508 was originally added to the Rehabilitation Act in
> 1986.