WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: High contrast options

for

Number of posts in this thread: 3 (In chronological order)

From: Carol Wheeler
Date: Wed, Oct 22 2008 9:05AM
Subject: High contrast options
No previous message | Next message →

Our sites (Word Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research) are undergoing a redesign and I was asked to comment on the high contrast, mostly because I am the squeaky wheel. My accessibility expertise is limited to trying to read as much as I can and being on this list.

Am I correct in thinking that the question of dark text/light background v. light text/dark background is more individual to users than accessibility on the whole? (Font scaling is being included in the redesign.)
It has been suggested that the high contrast version eliminates images, I think this is a bad idea--yes?
I also ran across a previous discussion point when searching the archives that including high contrast icons is an important consideration.

Carol E. Wheeler
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Web Department
American Institute for Cancer Research
1759 R Street NW
Washington DC 20009
Tel: 202-328-7744
Fax: 202-328-7226
http://www.aicr.org

From: John E. Brandt
Date: Wed, Oct 22 2008 10:05AM
Subject: Re: High contrast options
← Previous message | Next message →

Carol,

I cannot speak for the whole list but as someone who has been doing this
work for years.

My philosophy in design - and what I have encouraged others to do - is to
make sure you don't do anything that takes control away from the user. If a
user needs high contrast, larger fonts or particular colors, they can
install and use their own browser style sheets with those presentational
elements. If the website is built incorrectly and does not allow the user to
control this, it is not accessible (or usable).

There are plenty of ways to view a website without images, and if the user
wants them turned off, they should be able to do so.

The issue of font sizing (adding font sizing controls to the website using
JavaScript) is also controversial. Again, there are many ways a user can
adjust the size of the fonts with their browser - IF - the designer lets
them.

Build your site using WCAG and/or Section 508 guidelines and make sure the
code validates to W3C standards (I know not everyone agrees with this) and
the site should be usable to the largest number of people.

BTW, the color contrast issue is minor compared to the more common issue of
ALT descriptions for images, labeling input boxes and captioning videos.

~j

John E. Brandt
Augusta, Maine USA
www.jebswebs.com


-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Carol Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:03 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: [WebAIM] High contrast options

Our sites (Word Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research)
are undergoing a redesign and I was asked to comment on the high contrast,
mostly because I am the squeaky wheel. My accessibility expertise is limited
to trying to read as much as I can and being on this list.

Am I correct in thinking that the question of dark text/light background v.
light text/dark background is more individual to users than accessibility on
the whole? (Font scaling is being included in the redesign.)
It has been suggested that the high contrast version eliminates images, I
think this is a bad idea--yes?
I also ran across a previous discussion point when searching the archives
that including high contrast icons is an important consideration.

Carol E. Wheeler
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Web Department
American Institute for Cancer Research
1759 R Street NW
Washington DC 20009
Tel: 202-328-7744
Fax: 202-328-7226
http://www.aicr.org

From: Cliff Tyllick
Date: Wed, Oct 22 2008 10:20AM
Subject: Re: High contrast options
← Previous message | No next message

As for the "dark text/light background v. light text/dark background" issue, you are correct. In fact, it depends not only on the individual but also the device and setting. Move from a bright room to a dark room and your preference might change.

I recently discovered that light on dark actually worked better on my monitor in my office. (I keep the lights off. It isn't pitch dark, but dark enough that I sometimes have to turn the lights on to review printed material with visitors.) Then my computer was upgraded. With it, I got a new, flat-screen monitor. Now dark on light seems better. Viewing the same content on a handheld device in bright sunlight, I might have yet another preference.

From the standpoint of site design, you can't predict with complete certainty what temporary or permanent conditions might make it difficult for the user to view your content. Stay within the guidelines of WCAG for color difference and contrast, but don't prevent the user from changing the conditions to meet his or her own needs. (Some viewers might actually need a *low-contrast* option!)

Sounds like you're thinking right. I think John Brandt's advice is on the mark, too.

Cliff Tyllick
Web development coordinator
Agency Communications Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
512-239-4516
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =

>>> "Carol Wheeler" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > 10/22/2008 10:03 AM >>>
Our sites (Word Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research) are undergoing a redesign and I was asked to comment on the high contrast, mostly because I am the squeaky wheel. My accessibility expertise is limited to trying to read as much as I can and being on this list.

Am I correct in thinking that the question of dark text/light background v. light text/dark background is more individual to users than accessibility on the whole? (Font scaling is being included in the redesign.)
It has been suggested that the high contrast version eliminates images, I think this is a bad idea--yes?
I also ran across a previous discussion point when searching the archives that including high contrast icons is an important consideration.

Carol E. Wheeler
= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Web Department
American Institute for Cancer Research
1759 R Street NW
Washington DC 20009
Tel: 202-328-7744
Fax: 202-328-7226
http://www.aicr.org