WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: do you call a combo box a "combo box" in user documentation?

for

Number of posts in this thread: 3 (In chronological order)

From: glen walker
Date: Thu, Mar 22 2018 10:56AM
Subject: do you call a combo box a "combo box" in user documentation?
No previous message | Next message →

We are writing user guides and describing what actions you have to take to
change settings or print a report, etc. My advice to the documentation
writers is to use the "accessible name" (normally the label for the object)
and to include the object's type. So, for example, we'd say "Select the
Settings link" or "select the Start Date button".

But I'm not sure what to do with combo boxes (<select>/<option>). We want
the guides written for everyone. Technically, JAWS and NVDA call the
objects a "combo box". Voiceover calls them a "pop up button". But a
sighted user doesn't care what a screen reader calls them. "Combo box" is
kind of a technical term.

The writer's a leaning towards "drop down menu". That sort of explains the
behavior of the object. It does drop down and usually gives you a menu or
list of choices. Perhaps "drop down list"? Would either of those terms
makes sense to all users? If you're used to hearing AT say "combo box",
and then you listen to the user documentation and it says "drop down list",
is that ok?

From: JP Jamous
Date: Thu, Mar 22 2018 11:48AM
Subject: Re: do you call a combo box a "combo box" in userdocumentation?
← Previous message | Next message →

Glen,

The term Combo box comes from the Windows environment and not the Internet. It used to refer to the list box that has a text area where you can type the information and the list is populated as you type. A good example would be the Address bard in a browser or the edit combo in the Run dialog box in Windows.

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee671622(v=vs.85).aspx

As this is no longer the case on the internet, I agree with your content editors. Dropdown is what I use to refer to combo boxes. I have been using this term for the last 5 years and eliminate the Combo box term from my head unless I am talking about a Windows application. I may refer to an edit field such as the Google search box as a combo box, because it let's you type and as you type it pulls the list of results in a dropdown menu.

I think that the reason why combo box still exists in screen readers such as JAWS is because of Windows. If I am writing JAWS scripts for a Windows UI, I still refer to objects as combo boxes. The moment I am developing a web application or writing about one, I use dropdown element. While this is my own personal language, it does stay close to the intent of each type of object. Also, most web developers and UX designers say dropdown rather than combo box. In fact, I cannot recall any UX Designer or Developer stating combo box in the last 2 corporates I have worked at.

I hope that helps.



--------------------
JP Jamous
Senior Digital Accessibility Engineer
E-Mail Me |Join My LinkedIn Network
--------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > On Behalf Of glen walker
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 11:56 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Subject: [WebAIM] do you call a combo box a "combo box" in user documentation?

We are writing user guides and describing what actions you have to take to change settings or print a report, etc. My advice to the documentation writers is to use the "accessible name" (normally the label for the object) and to include the object's type. So, for example, we'd say "Select the Settings link" or "select the Start Date button".

But I'm not sure what to do with combo boxes (<select>/<option>). We want the guides written for everyone. Technically, JAWS and NVDA call the objects a "combo box". Voiceover calls them a "pop up button". But a sighted user doesn't care what a screen reader calls them. "Combo box" is kind of a technical term.

The writer's a leaning towards "drop down menu". That sort of explains the behavior of the object. It does drop down and usually gives you a menu or list of choices. Perhaps "drop down list"? Would either of those terms makes sense to all users? If you're used to hearing AT say "combo box", and then you listen to the user documentation and it says "drop down list", is that ok?

From: glen walker
Date: Thu, Mar 22 2018 12:54PM
Subject: Re: do you call a combo box a "combo box" in user documentation?
← Previous message | No next message

Thanks, JP. We can't completely eliminate "combo box" from our vocabulary
because of role='combobox' <https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#combobox>.



On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:48 AM, JP Jamous < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:

> Glen,
>
> The term Combo box comes from the Windows environment and not the
> Internet. It used to refer to the list box that has a text area where you
> can type the information and the list is populated as you type. A good
> example would be the Address bard in a browser or the edit combo in the Run
> dialog box in Windows.
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/
> ee671622(v=vs.85).aspx
>
> As this is no longer the case on the internet, I agree with your content
> editors. Dropdown is what I use to refer to combo boxes. I have been using
> this term for the last 5 years and eliminate the Combo box term from my
> head unless I am talking about a Windows application. I may refer to an
> edit field such as the Google search box as a combo box, because it let's
> you type and as you type it pulls the list of results in a dropdown menu.
>
> I think that the reason why combo box still exists in screen readers such
> as JAWS is because of Windows. If I am writing JAWS scripts for a Windows
> UI, I still refer to objects as combo boxes. The moment I am developing a
> web application or writing about one, I use dropdown element. While this is
> my own personal language, it does stay close to the intent of each type of
> object. Also, most web developers and UX designers say dropdown rather than
> combo box. In fact, I cannot recall any UX Designer or Developer stating
> combo box in the last 2 corporates I have worked at.
>
> I hope that helps.
>
>
>
> --------------------
> JP Jamous
> Senior Digital Accessibility Engineer
> E-Mail Me |Join My LinkedIn Network
> --------------------
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebAIM-Forum < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > On Behalf Of
> glen walker
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 11:56 AM
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
> Subject: [WebAIM] do you call a combo box a "combo box" in user
> documentation?
>
> We are writing user guides and describing what actions you have to take to
> change settings or print a report, etc. My advice to the documentation
> writers is to use the "accessible name" (normally the label for the object)
> and to include the object's type. So, for example, we'd say "Select the
> Settings link" or "select the Start Date button".
>
> But I'm not sure what to do with combo boxes (<select>/<option>). We want
> the guides written for everyone. Technically, JAWS and NVDA call the
> objects a "combo box". Voiceover calls them a "pop up button". But a
> sighted user doesn't care what a screen reader calls them. "Combo box" is
> kind of a technical term.
>
> The writer's a leaning towards "drop down menu". That sort of explains
> the behavior of the object. It does drop down and usually gives you a menu
> or list of choices. Perhaps "drop down list"? Would either of those terms
> makes sense to all users? If you're used to hearing AT say "combo box",
> and then you listen to the user documentation and it says "drop down list",
> is that ok?
> > > at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> >
> > > > >