E-mail List Archives
Thread: image link question
Number of posts in this thread: 3 (In chronological order)
From: Terzian, Sharon
Date: Thu, Sep 05 2019 9:03AM
Subject: image link question
No previous message | Next message →
Hi
I am looking for some documentation on using an image as a link to a document/download. Over the years, I have had the image include the file format logo (PDF, WORD, Power Point) as well as the file size, which has been the standard.
I always code both the alt and the title in the code. I realize that some of this dates back (20 years of doing this now!!) to when people had to use dial up and needed to know the file size up front, but I also think
it continues to be important as some people may be on a cellphone/wireless plan with limited data.
I'm currently getting some push back on it and can't find anything that exactly addresses this scenario.
Thanks.
Sharon Terzian
Webmistress/Accessible Content
From: Brian Lovely
Date: Thu, Sep 05 2019 9:16AM
Subject: Re: [External Sender] image link question
← Previous message | Next message →
Sharon, I don't think this violates any WCAG (up to AA) success criteria.
It may violate an AAA one, I honestly don't know. The closest AAA violation
would be 2.4.9 Link Purpose. I just read this over, and it doesn't seem to
apply, but I wouldn't swear to it. I think this falls in the realm of
usability rather than accessibility.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:03 AM Terzian, Sharon < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:
> Hi
> I am looking for some documentation on using an image as a link to a
> document/download. Over the years, I have had the image include the file
> format logo (PDF, WORD, Power Point) as well as the file size, which has
> been the standard.
>
> I always code both the alt and the title in the code. I realize that some
> of this dates back (20 years of doing this now!!) to when people had to use
> dial up and needed to know the file size up front, but I also think
> it continues to be important as some people may be on a cellphone/wireless
> plan with limited data.
>
> I'm currently getting some push back on it and can't find anything that
> exactly addresses this scenario.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sharon Terzian
> Webmistress/Accessible Content
>
>
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__list.webaim.org_&d=DwICAg&c=pLULRYW__RtkwsQUPxJVDGboCTdgji3AcHNJU0BpTJE&r=MMimM36KI-FWX0bnlG1RIV6Bl3MtdwmuKJCwL2Q3WrQ&m=0RYu1CluQ84CEFMLJ7p0IR1NBFhoOY-q78PwtmOduCA&s=4dJNtm75joGYyQNPl4oJEZuW7xpN0tkUsk3Svu-vZvw&e=
> List archives at
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__webaim.org_discussion_archives&d=DwICAg&c=pLULRYW__RtkwsQUPxJVDGboCTdgji3AcHNJU0BpTJE&r=MMimM36KI-FWX0bnlG1RIV6Bl3MtdwmuKJCwL2Q3WrQ&m=0RYu1CluQ84CEFMLJ7p0IR1NBFhoOY-q78PwtmOduCA&s=GOhdBenaCiesM9Lj2gKSTAZzrcvfAJERSFQNpUyULfo&e=
> >
--
*Brian Lovely*
Capital One Digital Accessibility
804.389.1064
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.
From: glen walker
Date: Thu, Sep 05 2019 6:11PM
Subject: Re: [External Sender] image link question
← Previous message | No next message
I agree with Brian about being a user experience question more than
accessibility. You could maybe argue that the link purpose might not be
fully understood if you don't have the file type, file size, etc but that's
debatable. If there's enough info to know that the link will download
something, is that enough to describe the purpose? Maybe. Do you need to
know the file type or file size? Maybe. It's a bit of a subjective
criterion.
As a user, I really like knowing the file type and file size. I would push
to include that from a usability side.