E-mail List Archives
Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge
From: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program
Date: Jun 23, 2008 11:00AM
- Next message: Jennison Mark Asuncion: "WCAG 1.0/2.0 and buttons that open a new window?"
- Previous message: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- View all messages in this Thread
<EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
> I am new to this group and fairly new to accessibility. As the
> accessibility coordinator of a state agency, I have been asked to
> verify the validity of a contractor's up-charge from 640 to 970 hours
> to build accessibility into a Cold Fusion application. The
> application is in the planning stage, with the only change being to
> make the application meet W3C Compliance Level A. The output is
> expected to be moderately complex scientific data, presented in
> tables.
>
> My question is: does the revision from 640 hours to 970 hours seem
> reasonable?
>
>
- Next message: Jennison Mark Asuncion: "WCAG 1.0/2.0 and buttons that open a new window?"
- Previous message: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program : "Re: Accessible Cold Fusion up-charge"
- View all messages in this Thread