E-mail List Archives
Re: web site to review
From: Jared Smith
Date: Aug 20, 2009 6:45AM
- Next message: Moore,Michael: "Re: MS Word accessibility supported for images?"
- Previous message: Mark Magennis: "MS Word accessibility supported for images?"
- Next message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: web site to review"
- Previous message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: web site to review"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Steven Henderson wrote:
> Robin, I would personally ditch the logo image for a carefully placed CSS
> background. Logos in my opinion, server no semantic purpose to non-visual
> users
So you're saying there's no utility in the user knowing the name of
the site they have just visited? If the logo is a link to the home
page, it MUST be semantic because it has a function. Logos are
certainly important content and should remain in content and not be
relegated to CSS backgrounds.
Jared Smith
WebAIM
- Next message: Moore,Michael: "Re: MS Word accessibility supported for images?"
- Previous message: Mark Magennis: "MS Word accessibility supported for images?"
- Next message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: web site to review"
- Previous message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: web site to review"
- View all messages in this Thread