E-mail List Archives
Re: Graphic symbols for people with low or no literacy
From: Carol Wheeler
Date: Nov 16, 2010 7:42AM
- Next message: Terrill Bennett: "Re: Graphic symbols for people with low or no literacy"
- Previous message: Dawn Budge: "Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: WCAG 2.0 Sufficient Technique G164"
- Next message in Thread: Terrill Bennett: "Re: Graphic symbols for people with low or no literacy"
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Mardahl: "Re: Graphic symbols for people with low or no literacy"
- View all messages in this Thread
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Karen Henry <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ">< <EMAIL REMOVED> ></a>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTik4v0bL+ <EMAIL REMOVED> "
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Has there been any research or does anyone have experience designing a website for those with low or no literacy and the best type of graphic symbols for navigation, etc.?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
I find the topic interesting, but am puzzled, how could some one
with "no literacy" use a Web page regardless of what icons are used.
To I misunderstand the term?<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature"><font color="#000000">-- Carol</font><br>
<p style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(0,
0, 0);"><strong>Carol E. Wheeler<br>
</strong><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> "> <EMAIL REMOVED> </a><br>
Web Department<br>
American Institute for Cancer Research<br>
1759 R Street NW<br>
Washington DC 20009<br>
Tel: 202-328-7744<br>
Fax: 202-328-7226<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.aicr.org">http://www.aicr.org</a></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
- Next message: Terrill Bennett: "Re: Graphic symbols for people with low or no literacy"
- Previous message: Dawn Budge: "Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: WCAG 2.0 Sufficient Technique G164"
- Next message in Thread: Terrill Bennett: "Re: Graphic symbols for people with low or no literacy"
- Previous message in Thread: Karen Mardahl: "Re: Graphic symbols for people with low or no literacy"
- View all messages in this Thread