E-mail List Archives
Re: WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?
From: Jeevan Reddy
Date: Aug 5, 2011 5:45AM
- Next message: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- Previous message: Jeevan Reddy: "Re: Your favorite samples of websites that are "ool" looking, yet accessible"
- Next message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- View all messages in this Thread
HI Donald,
if the APP controls are operable by Keyboard and same info is not exposing
To AT users, that will be violation of WCAG 2..0 SC 4.1.2(Name, Role,
Value). or else, the same info is exposing and are not operable by keyboard
when using AT, then it is certainly violation SC 2.1.1!.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Donald Evans < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> If I have a web app with controls that are keyboard accessible for the
> non-AT user, the JAWS user and the NVDA user in Internet Explorer; however,
> are not accessible to these users in FireFox, does it fail S.C. 2.1.1?
>
> --
> Donald F. Evans,
> Making Websites Accessible
> Senior Accessibility Architect
> Deque Systems
> Email: <EMAIL REMOVED>
> Download FireEyes Free: http://www.deque.com/products/worldspace-fireeyes
>
> <http://www.deque.com>
>
- Next message: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- Previous message: Jeevan Reddy: "Re: Your favorite samples of websites that are "ool" looking, yet accessible"
- Next message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- Previous message in Thread: Donald Evans: "WCAG 2.0 SC 2.1.1?"
- View all messages in this Thread