E-mail List Archives
Re: PDF/A accessibility
From: Duff Johnson
Date: Aug 9, 2011 2:54PM
- Next message: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- Previous message: Ron Stewart: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Ron Stewart: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
On Aug 9, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Ron Stewart wrote:
> Duff, actually this is not true as you and I have discussed previously!
Um... what isn't true?
> There are some shortcomings in regards to accessibility in PDF/UA as it is
> currently structured.
Ok, maybe (I'd like to hear more about that)... but the question was about PDF/A, not PDF/UA....
> Those are retention of reading order and pagination
> which are necessary components for producing accessible PDF documents.
I guess I'm not clear on what you mean. Could you please explain further?
> I
> find it to be continually problematic that the spokespeople for PDF
> accessibility to continue to ignore these inherent flaws in what is
> purported to be an "accessible" implementation.
I look forward to learning what - in particular - you find so problematic.
Thanks,
Duff Johnson
US Committee for ISO/DIS 14289 (PDF/UA), Chair
p +1.617.283.4226
e <EMAIL REMOVED>
t http://www.twitter.com/duffjohnson
w http://www.duff-johnson.com
>
- Next message: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- Previous message: Ron Stewart: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Ron Stewart: "Re: PDF/A accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread