E-mail List Archives
RE: keyboard access [was Re: Sample Sites]
From: Kynn Bartlett
Date: Sep 3, 2002 3:44AM
- Next message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re:
around images" - Previous message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: keyboard access [was Re: Sample Sites]"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka Korpela: "RE: keyboard access [was Re: Sample Sites]"
- View all messages in this Thread
At 8:52 AM +0300 9/2/02, Jukka Korpela wrote:
>As an implication, WCAG 1.0 priorities alone are not a sufficient basis for
>accessibility strategy. That is, it would be irrational to make it the
>primary objective to satisfy priority 1 requirements and only after that
>consider priority level 2, then priority 3.
Yep! I hate to do the Cassandra act, but I pointed this out when
priority-based compliance schemes were introduced in WCAG1, and nobody
cared to listen at the time. The result has been three years of confusion
about what constitutes a proper accessibility strategy -- including
the (IMNSHO) mess of Section 508. WCAG1 really provides a serious
disincentive to a rational accessibility plan.
--Kynn
--
Kynn Bartlett < <EMAIL REMOVED> > http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com
Next Book: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 http://cssin24hours.com
Kynn on Web Accessibility ->> http://kynn.com/+sitepoint
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re:
around images" - Previous message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: keyboard access [was Re: Sample Sites]"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jukka Korpela: "RE: keyboard access [was Re: Sample Sites]"
- View all messages in this Thread