E-mail List Archives
Re: mandatory Meta elements
From: Bim Egan
Date: Jul 30, 2012 3:35PM
- Next message: Angela French: "Re: your opinion on this link labeling please"
- Previous message: Lucy Greco: "Re: your opinion on this link labeling please"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis: "Re: mandatory Meta elements"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Benjamin,
Absolutely right, and this is the method I've always used, I just wanted to
flag up that @lang can be defined as a META tag too.
Cheers,
Bim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] mandatory Meta elements
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Bim Egan < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> In tests I've found that no
> screen readers ignore the LANG attribute of the HTML element, but looking
> this up, it appears that W3C noted a META tag method for language
> identification in HTML 4.0:
>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Language" Content="en">
> http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-html-lan
>
> In the event of no language being identified for a web document, a screen
> reader can only use its default language pronunciation rules. If the text
> is in a different language from the default, the content wouldn't be
> understood, even by someone fluent in both languages. As the
> identification
> of the human language for a document is a level A requirement of WCAG 2.0,
> I'd say it was essential.
You just need @lang on <html>, you don't need a <meta> element. You
can use @lang again whenever the content changes language within the
text.
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
- Next message: Angela French: "Re: your opinion on this link labeling please"
- Previous message: Lucy Greco: "Re: your opinion on this link labeling please"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis: "Re: mandatory Meta elements"
- View all messages in this Thread