E-mail List Archives
RE: Summary in Tables
From: Jukka Korpela
Date: Oct 21, 2002 4:58AM
- Next message: Freda Lockert: "1px gif link vs. hidden text link"
- Previous message: John Foliot - bytown internet: "RE: Summary in Tables"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
John Foliot wrote:
> Providing a summary for redundant or useless information is
> taxing on users of screen reading technology.
It is, but could it also be informative as regards to the fact that the
table _is_ for layout only? Without any summary attribute, how could the
user know that it is a layout table? Knowing that would help in deciding
that the table structure does not need to be guessed.
Or does it? What does "layout table" really mean? If a table is used around
a single cell to get a border, then it's surely for layout only. If it is
used to put two pieces of material side by side, then it has, in some sense,
a structure that perhaps should be explained: the first cell contains ...
and the second cell contains ... Maybe.
--
Jukka Korpela, senior adviser
TIEKE Finnish Information Society Development Centre
http://www.tieke.fi/
Diffuse Business Guide to Web Accessibility and Design for All:
http://www.diffuse.org/accessibility.html
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Freda Lockert: "1px gif link vs. hidden text link"
- Previous message: John Foliot - bytown internet: "RE: Summary in Tables"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread