E-mail List Archives
Re: landmarks in landmarks
From: Jared Smith
Date: Dec 11, 2013 9:32AM
- Next message: Clark, Michelle - NRCS, Washington, DC: "Re: State of Maryland accessibility office"
- Previous message: Broyles, Cristopher: "Re: Dissertation Research on Text-Equivalent Descriptions for the Blind – Can You Help?"
- Next message in Thread: Jacek Zadrożny: "Re: landmarks in landmarks"
- Previous message in Thread: Gunderson, Jon R: "Re: landmarks in landmarks"
- View all messages in this Thread
It is OK to embed landmark roles within other landmark roles. However,
I think it is assumed that the contentinfo landmark will contain links
about the site, copyright, etc. While the ARIA specification does not
state this, the HTML5 spec does clarify that <footer> (which maps to
the contentinfo role - see
http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2013/why-does-html-take-rolecontentinfo/)
should not include <nav> (which maps to the navigation role) for such
links.
I also don't think of such links as "navigation" in the strictest
sense. I would probably drop the navigation landmark from within the
contentinfo landmark/footer.
Jared
- Next message: Clark, Michelle - NRCS, Washington, DC: "Re: State of Maryland accessibility office"
- Previous message: Broyles, Cristopher: "Re: Dissertation Research on Text-Equivalent Descriptions for the Blind – Can You Help?"
- Next message in Thread: Jacek Zadrożny: "Re: landmarks in landmarks"
- Previous message in Thread: Gunderson, Jon R: "Re: landmarks in landmarks"
- View all messages in this Thread