E-mail List Archives

Re: Dialog semantics and aria?

for

From: Jesse Hausler
Date: Apr 29, 2014 3:16PM


Thanks everyone for this helpful discussion.

Any thoughts on why the ARIA Authoring practices guide suggests tabindex=0
on the document content area of an alertdialog? If there is nothing to
interact with, why set tabindex to 0?

http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices/#alertdialog

It's in the WAI-ARIA Roles, States, and Properties cell.

Thanks again,
Jesse


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Bryan Garaventa <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

> No worries, I didn't say that role=dialog should never be used, just that
> there are keyboard interaction and feedback differences to be aware of,
> since this often catches screen reader users off guard.
>
> I recommended role=region because it is supposed to provide beginning and
> ending boundary text information feedback for screen reader users, though I
> agree, this currently isn't working for NVDA, which there is an open bug
> about.
>
> Regardless whether you use either method, it's the content that needs to be
> accessible, and the method of rendering that is important here, so when the
> dialog is rendered, the background content should be hidden properly, focus
> should be set appropriately for keyboard users, the content must all be
> accessible in an intuitive manner, the dialog must be closable from the
> keyboard, and focus should return to the triggering element after it closes
> if a triggering element is present.
>
> The rest is just semantics.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <EMAIL REMOVED>
> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Ravindra Kumar
> Jain
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 2:12 AM
> To: webaim-forum
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Dialog semantics and aria?
>
> Hi List,
>
> I see that this particular thread is talking about " Dialog Semantics "
> and the solution that is coming out is that of inserting "role="region"".
> I
> am sorry to disagree with the solution given by Bryan . You see , as far as
> making modal windows accessible is concerned Something similar issue
> came
> in one of the projects I've handled. first of all , I've tested what the
> solution you've given by inserting code using firebug , and let me tell
> you that role="region" is working quite well with JAWS in both firefox /
> IE, to that extent it is getting recognized as a landmark , which in my
> opinion is not a good idea as far as WAI-ARIA landmark page role taxonomy
> is concerned, since if role="region" is supposed to be a landmark , then
> why is not recognized as such in w3c documents ?
>
> My Second point is that role ="region" is simply overlooked by NVDA.
> So, should we totally overlook Open Source products while suggesting
> accessibility solutions to the developers or wait till eternity. Will
> Open Source Products catch up fast ?
>
> I guess this is just one instance of discrepancy among the people in the
> field of accessibility. Only thing which seems to be common is we all
> agree to disagree.
>
> This I guess , is a sorry state of affairs. This is how I will describe the
> situation.
>
> <blockquote> Instead of crossing the ocean of Inaccessibility by
> travelling in a huge ship of Accessibility under the strong leadership of
> W3C, different User Agent Vendors , Corporations , Companies
> manufacturing
> Assistive Technologies like Screen Reders etc. are travelling in their
> own small small boats. You can imagine and smile at what is bound to
> happen. Will their be a day when people industry wide are going to agree
> and collaborate on atleast
> one thing and that is "Accessibility" ? </blockquote>
>
> I think Mr. Tim Berners Lee will be more than happy that day.
>
> Thanks ,
>
> Ravindra Kumar Jain
> Accessibility Engineer
> http://www.onyadigital.com
> > > messages to <EMAIL REMOVED>
>
> > > >