E-mail List Archives
Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?
From: Thomas McKeithan II
Date: Dec 30, 2014 8:12AM
- Next message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- Previous message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- Next message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- Previous message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- View all messages in this Thread
I concur with Joy. We should determine conformance to the standards basd upon how the page is coded and not how a specific AT Tool behavors. For years I've advocated fot testing using AT Tools with the "out of the Box" settings rather than customizations.
Respectfully,
Thomas Lee McKeithan II
QSSI
http://www.qssinc.com
508 SME, SSQA Solutions Center
10480 Little Patuxent Pkwy , Suite 350
Columbia , MD 21044
(301 )977-7884 x1058 (Work)
(202) 276-6437 (Cell)
This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic email or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entirety.
- Next message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- Previous message: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- Next message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- Previous message in Thread: Lynn Holdsworth: "Re: Are fieldset and legend still relevant?"
- View all messages in this Thread