E-mail List Archives
Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?
From: Lynn Holdsworth
Date: Jan 5, 2015 10:29AM
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message: Paul J. Adam: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks very much everyone. Looks like we're all on the same page.
I don't like seeing either a title or placeholder as a label
replacement, so knowing where I can fail either is great news for me -
if not for the developers of the site I'm auditing.
But there's definitely a school of thought that says title is
sufficient where the design can't accommodate an explicit, visible
label. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks again, Lynn
On 05/01/2015, Angela French < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I am a sighted person who has long rallied against placeholder text for all
> the reasons illustrated in theNNGroup article.
>
>
- Next message: Jared Smith: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message: Paul J. Adam: "Re: High Contrast Control Option"
- Next message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- Previous message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: Placeholder instead of explicit label?"
- View all messages in this Thread