E-mail List Archives
Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDF document?
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Apr 15, 2015 6:03AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDF document?"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Regular Accessibility Meetups"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDF document?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDF document?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 15/04/2015 12:46, Duff Johnson wrote:
>> I.e. if fonts are not embedded, what SC do you think is failing? If that failure can be turned into a pass/success if fonts *are* enabled, then that is justification enough for embedding the fonts.
>
> So… what do you think? Which SC applies, if any?
Well, what is the problem that can arise when fonts aren't embedded?
P
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDF document?"
- Previous message: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Regular Accessibility Meetups"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDF document?"
- Previous message in Thread: Duff Johnson: "Re: Do fonts have to be embedded in a WCAG 2.0 conforming PDF document?"
- View all messages in this Thread