E-mail List Archives
Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion
From: Howard Kramer
Date: Apr 29, 2015 1:32PM
- Next message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: is there a modern Linux screen reader?"
- Next message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- Previous message in Thread: Sylvia Richardson: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks Sylvia - that's the kind of info I was looking for.
-Howard
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Sylvia Richardson <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I would recommend the Adobe add-in very strongly, especially for
> PowerPoint presentations or Word docs with headers/footers. It does a much
> better job of marking content as artifacts where appropriate. The automatic
> bookmarking is also better.
>
> -Sylvia
>
>
- Next message: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: is there a modern Linux screen reader?"
- Next message in Thread: Cliff Tyllick: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- Previous message in Thread: Sylvia Richardson: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- View all messages in this Thread