E-mail List Archives
Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion
From: Cliff Tyllick
Date: Apr 29, 2015 1:50PM
- Next message: Bourne, Sarah (ITD): "Re: WCAG2 and vertical bars (|)"
- Previous message: Howard Kramer: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Howard Kramer: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- View all messages in this Thread
Sylvia, can you give me a specific example of a document in which tge Adobe add-in has shown this advantage? Perhaps send me an example of a PowerPoint document and the two resulting PDFs off line?
The skeptics I work with will push me for details. ð
Thanks in advance!
Cliff Tyllick
Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services
<EMAIL REMOVED>
Sent from my iPhone
Although its spellcheck often saves me, all goofs in sent messages are its fault.
> On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Howard Kramer < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Thanks Sylvia - that's the kind of info I was looking for.
>
> -Howard
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Sylvia Richardson <
> <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
>> I would recommend the Adobe add-in very strongly, especially for
>> PowerPoint presentations or Word docs with headers/footers. It does a much
>> better job of marking content as artifacts where appropriate. The automatic
>> bookmarking is also better.
>>
>> -Sylvia
>>
>>
- Next message: Bourne, Sarah (ITD): "Re: WCAG2 and vertical bars (|)"
- Previous message: Howard Kramer: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Howard Kramer: "Re: PDFMaker vs. Word Add-in for pdf conversion"
- View all messages in this Thread