E-mail List Archives
Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Apr 15, 2016 2:30PM
- Next message: Angela French: "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- Previous message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- Next message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- View all messages in this Thread
> I would appreciate a little accessibility-related feedback on the two tables on this page<
Scope is sufficient because the headers all apply to all cells in that column. Ids and headers would be needed when not all headers in column apply to all cells -- e.g. you have different sections/subheaders further down in the table.
Jonathan
Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART GroupÂ
<EMAIL REMOVED>
703.637.8957 (Office)
Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | Linkedin | Blog
Check out our Digital Accessibility Webinars!
- Next message: Angela French: "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- Previous message: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- Next message in Thread: Angela French: "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- Previous message in Thread: Moore,Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC): "Re: accessible tables: colgroup vs headers and ids"
- View all messages in this Thread