WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Color of link text

for

From: Joseph Sherman
Date: Jul 7, 2016 1:06AM

Given that focus and hover do not really exist on mobile, and mobile devices are ubiquitous, should the 3:1 contrast plus focus/hover indication remain a conforming technique?

If not, then to use links without underline wouldn't you need to find three colors (background, text, links) with 4.5:1 contrast from the other two? Do such colors exist?

Joseph

On Jun 27, 2016 9:17 PM, Jonathan Avila < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> My question is whether the focus outline itself counts as an additional differentiation, when the link receives focus, if it has the 3:1 contrast between the link and surrounding text. It seems to technically satisfy 1.4.1, but I don't think it should.

Joseph, I often wondered the same thing. F73 does not include test steps saying to focus the links which G183 does and thus currently with F73 a link that just uses color (hue) would fail F73. F73 also does not relate to contrast -- but only focuses on Hue -- so links and text that are differentiated with contrast/lightness could pass F73. This is definitely an area that could use some clarification.

F73: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20130905/F73

In the check for G183 it doesn't seem to say that an outline is not sufficient -- it just says some other visual enhancement but doesn't specify if that enhancement must be on the link text itself or can surround the link text. If you consider image links -- they have similar challenges with the user not knowing they are clickable.

G183 https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20130905/G183.html

Jonathan

Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
SSB BART Group
<EMAIL REMOVED>
703.637.8957 (Office)

Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | Linkedin | Blog
Check out our Digital Accessibility Webinars!