E-mail List Archives
Re: section 508 vs wcag 2.0
From: Maya.Sellon
Date: Jul 19, 2016 5:36AM
- Next message: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "Re: Recall: section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- Previous message: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- Next message in Thread: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "Re: Recall: section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- Previous message in Thread: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- View all messages in this Thread
I just found a list of 4 checkpoints in WCAG that supposedly aren't in Section 508 on : http://jimthatcher.com/sidebyside.htm
He refers to checkpoints 1.3, 4.1, 6.2 and 14.1. The page was last updated in 2012, so I believe this is still current. Can anyone else confirm, please?
Thanks again :)
From: Sellon, Maya M SI-ERP/D
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:28 PM
To: 'WebAIM Discussion List'
Subject: section 508 vs wcag 2.0
Hi all,
My company standards requires me to check against WCAG 2.0 level AA - however a tool that we're currently looking into (Formstack) only seems to have documentation against Section 508. I know there are some differences and a quick scan tells me WCAG requires specific techniques as is more current than 508, but I was hoping someone out there would have some tips/advice on how I could go about comparing this section 508-based report against WCAG?
Additionally, anything I should be on the lookout for? I'm just wondering if anyone has any experience with this and found out the hard way that you had to check for XXX or YYY.
Many thanks!
Maya
- Next message: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "Re: Recall: section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- Previous message: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- Next message in Thread: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "Re: Recall: section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- Previous message in Thread: Maya.Sellon@shell.com: "section 508 vs wcag 2.0"
- View all messages in this Thread