WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: which guideline to empty headers go against?

for

From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Nov 22, 2016 8:35AM

> Yes, I'd agree it certainly fails 1.3.1 (this is where I normally flag empty headings in audits).

I'd generally agree with this as well.

Jonathan



-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:54 AM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] which guideline to empty headers go against?



On 22/11/2016 09:40, Bim Egan wrote:
> I'd say this is a definite fail of SC 2.4.6: Headings and labels
> describe topic or purpose, [1]. No text content means no description.

If the page is understandable without that empty heading (which I'd assume is the case, if these headings are accidentally created), then I'd say it's a pass here.

> Empty headings probably also fail SC1.3.1 Info and Relationships [2]
> check out Failure Technique F43: Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1
> due to using structural markup in a way that does not represent
> relationships in the content [3]

Yes, I'd agree it certainly fails 1.3.1 (this is where I normally flag empty headings in audits).

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke