E-mail List Archives
Re: Available title indication via css
From: Wolfgang Berndorfer
Date: Nov 10, 2017 2:46PM
- Next message: Bim Egan: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- Next message in Thread: Bim Egan: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Jared!
I totally agree that the TITLE attribute is somehow a Zombie in HTML:
1. Missing Keyboard and Touch Screen Accessibility in lot of cases.
2. Screen Reader Output depending on the available Screen Reader and
Settings.
3. Ambivalent infos in specs, techs and discussions.
4. Abusing, missunderstood and verbous usage.
But the Zombie is not dead but alive, practised and even often helpful.
ItÂs potentially helpful for sighted keyboard and mouse users, who siply
want to get some quick information. And those must visually get aware that
THERE WAS some advirsory information available.
So we could discusse a lot about the TITLE-attribute itself. But my question
was about HOW TO MAKE THE BEST OUT OF IT VIA STYLESHEETS.
If there was a standard for links to be underlined for additional or
descriptive informations to be dotted or dashed, somewhen there would be no
more missunderstandig. My impression is that there is already a tendency in
this direction.
And if Safari doesnÂt support this feature at all, I wold say: It should!
Good Night from Innsbruck!
Wolfgang
<EMAIL REMOVED>
http://www.zweiterblick.at
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] Im Auftrag
von Jared Smith
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. November 2017 21:34
An: WebAIM Discussion List
Betreff: Re: [WebAIM] Available title indication via css
The title attribute value is not always read by screen readers (this
depends on the screen reader and the settings), is inaccessible to keyboard
users, is often not available to touch screen users, etc. So we rarely
recommend it and rarely use it on the WebAIM site.
And we rarely use or recommend <abbr> and <acronym>. Instead, commonly
known acronyms should be used, or they should be expanded in text in their
first instance.
Those styles are in place simply to present a more consistent visual
identification across browsers. Every browser tends to style <abbr> and
<acronym> differently. And some, including Safari, don't style them at all.
And even when styled, I suspect it's possible that users may confuse the
dotted or dashed underline for a link, except that you can't tab to it and
clicking it doesn't trigger a page change.
In short, the title attribute is generally problematic, unless used purely
for advisory information for mouse users and (sometimes) screen reader
users.
Thanks,
Jared Smith
WebAIM.org
- Next message: Bim Egan: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- Previous message: Jared Smith: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- Next message in Thread: Bim Egan: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: Available title indication via css"
- View all messages in this Thread