E-mail List Archives
Re: Explicit association with <header> required/recommendedfor <article>?
From: JP Jamous
Date: Feb 5, 2018 9:13AM
- Next message: Robert Fentress: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - Previous message: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - Next message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - Previous message in Thread: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - View all messages in this Thread
Rob,
It would be unnecessary because you already informed the screen reader of your region labeling. So using ARIA at this point would not be advised by ARIA standards.
If you have 2 different <header> on the page, then using ari-label might be necessary to explain to the screen reader user programmatically what each one serves. Typically, I expect as a user to have one <header> on a web page. If I run into more than one, it can confuse me, as I may not be able to identify the purpose of the second header or where it applies in relationship to the rest of the page.
- Next message: Robert Fentress: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - Previous message: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - Next message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - Previous message in Thread: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - View all messages in this Thread