E-mail List Archives
Re: Explicit association with <header> required/recommendedfor <article>?
From: chagnon@pubcom.com
Date: Feb 5, 2018 9:09AM
- Next message: JP Jamous: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - Previous message: Robert Fentress: "Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - Next message in Thread: JP Jamous: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - Previous message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - View all messages in this Thread
I think you mean heading, not header.
Headers are repeating elements at the top of something, such as a page header or table header.
The Article tag's definition is that it designates a self-contained portion of a larger document. It is a grouping or container tag that encompasses, by definition, other tagged elements such as P and Hx tags.
To me, the relationship is already explicit because the Hx tag is within the Article tag.
â â â
Bevi Chagnon, founder/CEO | <EMAIL REMOVED>
â â â
PubCom: Technologists for Accessible Design + Publishing
consulting ' training ' development ' design ' sec. 508 services
Upcoming classes at www.PubCom.com/classes
â â â
-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Robert Fentress
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 11:00 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: [WebAIM] Explicit association with <header> required/recommended for <article>?
If content is marked up with the <article> tag and within that <article> tag there is a <header> tag, is it required or recommended to make an explicit association between them using aria-labelledby attribute or would that be redundant or too verbose? Thanks!
--
Rob Fentress
Senior Accessibility Solutions Designer
Assistive Technologies at Virginia Tech
Electronic Business Card (vCard)
<http://search.vt.edu/search/person.vcf?person54847>
LinkedIn Profile
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rob-fentress-aa0b609?trk=profile-badge>
- Next message: JP Jamous: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - Previous message: Robert Fentress: "Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - Next message in Thread: JP Jamous: "Re: Explicit association with
required/recommendedfor ?" - Previous message in Thread: Robert Fentress: "Explicit association with
required/recommended for ?" - View all messages in this Thread