E-mail List Archives
Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?
From: chagnon
Date: Jul 30, 2018 4:59PM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: (Title element) WAS WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Previous message: John Foliot: "Re: (Title element) WAS WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Next message in Thread: Jeevan Reddy: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- Previous message in Thread: L Snider: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- View all messages in this Thread
We find that no one tool finds everything.
We recommend that our clients run the Acrobat checker first, correct the
errors it finds, and then run PAC3.
Acrobat does not find all errors...not even close!
Wish it did a better job, though.
--Bevi Chagnon
- - -
Bevi Chagnon, founder/CEO | <EMAIL REMOVED>
- - -
PubCom: Technologists for Accessible Design + Publishing
consulting . training . development . design . sec. 508 services
Upcoming classes at www.PubCom.com/classes
- - -
Latest blog-newsletter - Accessibility Tips
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: (Title element) WAS WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Previous message: John Foliot: "Re: (Title element) WAS WCAG 2.1 - 1.3.5 - How to capture a violation?"
- Next message in Thread: Jeevan Reddy: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- Previous message in Thread: L Snider: "Re: Acrobat Accessibility Check vs. PAC 3.0?"
- View all messages in this Thread