E-mail List Archives
Re: Oracle SQL Developer 4.0, JAWS 16, and NVDA 2018.2.1 Question with respect to accessibility
From: Sean Murphy
Date: Aug 17, 2018 11:19AM
- Next message: Walker (US), Michael E: "Re: Oracle SQL Developer 4.0, JAWS 16, and NVDA 2018.2.1 Question with respect to accessibility"
- Previous message: Joseph Sherman: "PDF Validator Failures?"
- Next message in Thread: Walker (US), Michael E: "Re: Oracle SQL Developer 4.0, JAWS 16, and NVDA 2018.2.1 Question with respect to accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Walker (US), Michael E: "Oracle SQL Developer 4.0, JAWS 16, and NVDA 2018.2.1 Question with respect to accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
I would suggest to reach out to their accessibility team and ask this question
Sean
My experience is the part
> On 17 Aug 2018, at 11:27 pm, Walker (US), Michael E < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Hi, my teammate at work wants me to be able to use SQL Developer, so he can go over the database with me that I will be making changes to. In the past, I have had problems in general getting JAWS to read SQL Developer 4.0, so I settled for SQL*Plus. When I enabled Java Access Bridge, it used to be that JAWS would crash in Windows 7 when using SQL Developer. That was JAWS 16. I enabled whatever version of JAB was in the Ease of Access Center.
>
> How much time should I be spending troubleshooting SQL Developer? The JAWS crash seems to be okay on Windows 10 now. Also, how well does SQL Developer work with NVDA 2018.2.1?
>
> Thank you,
> Mike
> > > >
- Next message: Walker (US), Michael E: "Re: Oracle SQL Developer 4.0, JAWS 16, and NVDA 2018.2.1 Question with respect to accessibility"
- Previous message: Joseph Sherman: "PDF Validator Failures?"
- Next message in Thread: Walker (US), Michael E: "Re: Oracle SQL Developer 4.0, JAWS 16, and NVDA 2018.2.1 Question with respect to accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Walker (US), Michael E: "Oracle SQL Developer 4.0, JAWS 16, and NVDA 2018.2.1 Question with respect to accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread