E-mail List Archives
Re: transcription of audio
From: KP
Date: Nov 5, 2018 1:17PM
- Next message: Haim Roman: "Icons Becoming Simpler?"
- Previous message: Howard Kramer: "Last week to register for the Accessing Higher Ground 2018 Virtual Conference"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: FW: transcription of audio"
- View all messages in this Thread
The 1.2.x cover all media. 1.2.1 is for audio/video only, 1.2.2 requires captions, etc.
All allow for no transcription as long as the media is an alternative presentation of information that is already on the page AND it is labelled as such
K
Sent from my iPhone
> On 5/11/2018, at 23:21, Sean Murphy < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Is it anything for hearing impairment for transcriptions other than the one you have just stated?
>
> My experience is the part
>
>> On 5 Nov 2018, at 9:18 pm, KP < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>>
>> 1.2.3 "
>> An alternative for time-based media or audio description of the prerecorded video content is provided for synchronized media, except when the media is a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such." Would cover that
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 5/11/2018, at 19:19, < <EMAIL REMOVED> > < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have just looked through the WCAG 2.1 guidelines and I did not find any SC
>>> for transcription of Video with Audio. Is this a part of WCAG or not? If so,
>>> what SC?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sean
>>>
>>> >>> >>> >>> >>
>> >> >> >> > > > >
- Next message: Haim Roman: "Icons Becoming Simpler?"
- Previous message: Howard Kramer: "Last week to register for the Accessing Higher Ground 2018 Virtual Conference"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jared Smith: "Re: FW: transcription of audio"
- View all messages in this Thread