E-mail List Archives
Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her
From: Greg Jellin
Date: Nov 16, 2018 8:20AM
- Next message: England, Kristina: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- Previous message: Laura Fathauer: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- Next message in Thread: England, Kristina: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- Previous message in Thread: Laura Fathauer: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- View all messages in this Thread
FAE is awesome. It isn't perfect, but very detailed and finds things
that other tools don't. It is great to use in addition to other tools.
Greg
On 11/16/2018 7:08 AM, Laura Fathauer wrote:
> It has the most extensive, strict ruleset. But I like thata its in the
> browser window and dynamically updates as you browse.
>
> Laura
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM Patrick H. Lauke < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
>> On 16/11/2018 14:57, Reinhard Stebner wrote:
>>> What do you think of the FAE Web evaluator and how does this compare to
>> Wave? How does this compare with WAVE
>>
>> Last time I looked at it (admittedly a few years back), I found it very
>> "opinionated". Flagging things as failures that were really just best
>> practices/suggestions, in my view (like, from memory, flagging absence
>> of a heading before a navigation section, to indicate it's a navigation
>> section, as a failure)
>>
>> It may have improved in the last few years though...
>>
>> P
>> --
>> Patrick H. Lauke
>>
>> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
>> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>> >> >> >> >>
> > > >
- Next message: England, Kristina: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- Previous message: Laura Fathauer: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- Next message in Thread: England, Kristina: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- Previous message in Thread: Laura Fathauer: "Re: FAE Accessibility evaluate her"
- View all messages in this Thread