E-mail List Archives
Re: Tab and accordion order
From: glen walker
Date: Sep 5, 2019 6:04PM
- Next message: mhysnm1964@gmail.com: "Re: SC 2.1.2 and braille displays/notetakers"
- Previous message: Martin, Alex: "alt text for banner ads"
- Next message in Thread: mhysnm1964@gmail.com: "Re: Tab and accordion order"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: Tab and accordion order"
- View all messages in this Thread
I suppose it might depend if you're asking about a compliance violation vs
the user experience.
1.3.2 talks about Meaningful Sequence and if the reading order affects the
*meaning* of the content. The "understanding" section says, "A sequence is
meaningful if the order of content in the sequence cannot be changed
without affecting its meaning". In this case, if the tabs were read first
and then the content, or vice versa, I don't think it affects the *meaning*
of the content. It might be confusing trying to associate which tab is
associated with the content but I don't think it affects the meaning of the
content.
Somewhat related is 2.4.3 Focus Order. It talks about meaning *and*
operation. If the tab order affects the mean or if the tab order affects
the operation. But again, whether the tabs are read first or the content
is read first, I don't think that affects the meaning or operation of the
tabs. Initially it might make it harder to figure out where the tabs are
(if after the content) but it doesn't prevent me from using the tabs to
change the content.
But that doesn't really address your main question which is more about the
user experience than compliance.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:17 AM Brian Lovely via WebAIM-Forum <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> I occasionally see tabs or accordions where the content precedes the tabs
> or buttons controlling it. I see this as a violation of 1.3.2 Finding Added
> Content, in addition to seeming less logical than the controlled content
> being the next thing in focus order from the control.
>
> My question to non-visual screen reader users is do you find "reversed" tab
> or accordion order problematic? Most of the time when I am describing the
> human impact of a WCAG violation, I feel pretty confident that there is a
> clear impediment to use, but with this one, I feel less confident.
>
> --
> *Brian Lovely*
> Capital One Digital Accessibility
> 804.389.1064
>
> >
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from your computer.
>
>
>
> > > > >
- Next message: mhysnm1964@gmail.com: "Re: SC 2.1.2 and braille displays/notetakers"
- Previous message: Martin, Alex: "alt text for banner ads"
- Next message in Thread: mhysnm1964@gmail.com: "Re: Tab and accordion order"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Cohn: "Re: Tab and accordion order"
- View all messages in this Thread