E-mail List Archives
Re: Does SC1.3.1 require landmarks?
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Oct 12, 2020 1:00PM
- Next message: Philip Kiff: "Re: Adobe Acrobat PDF Tables issue"
- Previous message: L Snider: "Re: Adobe Acrobat PDF Tables issue"
- Next message in Thread: Guy Hickling: "Re: Does SC1.3.1 require landmarks?"
- Previous message in Thread: wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at: "Re: Does SC1.3.1 require landmarks?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 12/10/2020 19:03, <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
[...]
> So, what should I do? Check or not? Recommend only as best practice?
It's the usual "it depends" with WCAG, as 1.3.1 has many subjective
aspects (as most other SCs). Is the user likely not to understand the
page/content without those landmarks/regions/structures which are
visually evident also being explicitly marked up?
In my view, anyway...
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Philip Kiff: "Re: Adobe Acrobat PDF Tables issue"
- Previous message: L Snider: "Re: Adobe Acrobat PDF Tables issue"
- Next message in Thread: Guy Hickling: "Re: Does SC1.3.1 require landmarks?"
- Previous message in Thread: wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at: "Re: Does SC1.3.1 require landmarks?"
- View all messages in this Thread