E-mail List Archives
Re: Vertical text
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Feb 8, 2021 12:52PM
- Next message: Barry: "Unaware of sitemap due to forced focus"
- Previous message: James Buller: "Vertical text"
- Next message in Thread: Murphy, Sean: "Re: Vertical text"
- Previous message in Thread: James Buller: "Vertical text"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 08/02/2021 18:09, James Buller wrote:
> Is there anything new on this?
> I've seen a couple of things with angled/slanted or even vertical text but not had any formal basis to object.
> They have tended to be on diagrams or posters.
> Any thoughts on acceptable maximums?
> How would one go about proposing it? Its similar in concept to WCAG 1.3.4: Orientation
If done via CSS, it could be overridden by users, the same way that
users can override text spacing that's too small/narrow (of course, the
technical knowledge required for this is non-trivial, but the concept's
the same).
I'd be quite careful proposing that WCAG should start messing even
further with trying to restrict visual styling possibilities...otherwise
you'll get to a point where designers/developers will just try to ignore
WCAG unless they're absolutely forced to follow it.
A softer approach of a best practice/suggestion/whitepaper would, to me,
be better than trying to crowbar in a "you're not allowed to have text
perpendicular to the regular reading orientation" or something.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Barry: "Unaware of sitemap due to forced focus"
- Previous message: James Buller: "Vertical text"
- Next message in Thread: Murphy, Sean: "Re: Vertical text"
- Previous message in Thread: James Buller: "Vertical text"
- View all messages in this Thread