E-mail List Archives
Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?
From: Maraikayar Prem Nawaz
Date: Mar 25, 2021 12:23AM
- Next message: Mark Magennis: "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- Previous message: Andrews, David B (DEED): "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Magennis: "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- Previous message in Thread: Andrews, David B (DEED): "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- View all messages in this Thread
The frequent use of landmarks and regions has continually decreased from
43.8% in 2014, to 38.6% in 2015, to 30.5% in 2017, to 26.6% on this survey.
It's difficult to know the reasons for this. It could be due to infrequent
or improper usage of landmarks/regions in pages. Or perhaps because other
mechanisms are continually better.
https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey8/#landmarks
Browsing by headings has a huge acceptance than landmarks.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:09 PM Andrews, David B (DEED) <
<EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> This site did have a log of regions!
>
> I don't know what it is like visually, but when you arrow through, using
> JAWS, versus tabbing through, they are quite different experiences.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
- Next message: Mark Magennis: "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- Previous message: Andrews, David B (DEED): "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Magennis: "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- Previous message in Thread: Andrews, David B (DEED): "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- View all messages in this Thread