E-mail List Archives
Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion 1.2.5
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Apr 23, 2021 1:59AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion1.2.5"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion 1.2.5"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion1.2.5"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion 1.2.5"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 23/04/2021 08:54, glen walker wrote:
> The original question was whether gaps are a prerequisite or an "out" for
> needing AD. The SC does not imply that at all.
Which we had established, yes.
> The side discussions on whether you need to re-record or create freeze
> frames or whether a non-visual action needs to be described or whether AD
> is an undue burden are interesting but tangential to the crux of the
> question.
You playing discussion police? Should we have changed the subject line
of the email?
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion1.2.5"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion 1.2.5"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion1.2.5"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Audio description in WCAG 2.1 AA success criterion 1.2.5"
- View all messages in this Thread