E-mail List Archives
Re: 4.1.2 correct roles
From: Laura Fathauer
Date: Aug 24, 2022 12:10PM
- Next message: bhargavvaghasiya24@gmail.com: "checking 2.5.3 labels in name"
- Previous message: wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at: "Re: 4.1.2 correct roles"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at: "Re: 4.1.2 correct roles"
- View all messages in this Thread
Note there is a connection to function in the definition of "role":
role: text or number by which software can identify the function of a
component within Web content
From my perspective, if something functions as a "link" and your text says
"listbox," then by 4.1.2 you don't have a programmatically determinable
"role" since the text isn't actually describing the function.
Laura
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:26 PM < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:
> I would suppose that the following interpretation of 4.1.2 would make no
> sense:
> âAll user interface components need ANY role that can be programmatically
> determined.â
> Here is a fitting sufficient technique for this misinterpretation:
> âMark up each user interface component as a link.â
>
> F59 states that using script to make div or span a user interface control
> is a failure.
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F59
> Why is it a failure?
> âAssistive technologies rely on knowledge of the role and current state of
> a component in order to provide that information to the user.â
>
> IMO the spirit of SC 4.1.2 is to apply the FITTING role.
>
>
>
- Next message: bhargavvaghasiya24@gmail.com: "checking 2.5.3 labels in name"
- Previous message: wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at: "Re: 4.1.2 correct roles"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: wolfgang.berndorfer@zweiterblick.at: "Re: 4.1.2 correct roles"
- View all messages in this Thread