E-mail List Archives
Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?
From: Thomas Jedenfelt
Date: May 23, 2005 3:33PM
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Previous message: Stephanie Sullivan: "Re: flash satay firefox bug"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- View all messages in this Thread
I have misunderstood Patrick H. Lauke's reply.
(http://www.webaim.org/discussion/mail_message.php?id=6681)
>
> Yes on both accounts, but I can't think of a situation where
> (particularly nowadays, using CSS) you'd need to circumvent 10.2...
>
> -- Patrick H. Lauke
I understand now that he means that it is good practice to follow Checkpoint 10.2. That is, to place the description text (label) next to the form control.
Example:
<LABEL for="firstname">First name:
<INPUT type="text" id="firstname" tabindex="1">
</LABEL>
I will read Paul Bohman's reply after a good night's sleep.
Regards,
Thomas Jedenfelt
--
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 8 at http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Previous message: Stephanie Sullivan: "Re: flash satay firefox bug"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- View all messages in this Thread