E-mail List Archives
RE: Unordered Lists
From: Patrick Lauke
Date: Aug 12, 2005 11:12AM
- Next message: Joseph O'Connor: "Mailman accessibility"
- Previous message: Paul Collins: "Re: Best practice for warning users of opening window"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Unordered Lists"
- Previous message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "RE: Unordered Lists"
- View all messages in this Thread
> Thomas Jedenfelt
> You said that "The problem with OL is that it implies a
> hierarchy/order that is not necessarily there".
> Are you sure that the (your) users, nowadays, find OL more...
> impractical(?) that UL.
I'm not saying that OL is impractical. For the user, it's not that
different from UL. However, it's the wrong element/construct to use
from a web standards / semantic / structural point of view.
And yes, if you want to pay for it, I'd be glad to get more
testing done *grin*
Patrick
___________
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
___________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
___________
- Next message: Joseph O'Connor: "Mailman accessibility"
- Previous message: Paul Collins: "Re: Best practice for warning users of opening window"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Unordered Lists"
- Previous message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "RE: Unordered Lists"
- View all messages in this Thread